Archive

Posts Tagged ‘google’

Researchers identify command servers behind Google attack

January 15th, 2010 admin No comments

VeriSign's iDefense security lab has published a report with technical details about the recent cyberattack that hit Google and over 30 other companies. The iDefense researchers traced the attack back to its origin and also identified the command-and-control servers that were used to manage the malware.

The cyber-assault came to light on Tuesday when Google disclosed to the public that the Gmail Web service was targeted in a highly-organized attack in late December. Google said that the intrusion attempt originated from China and was executed with the goal of obtaining information about political dissidents, but the company declined to speculate about the identity of the perpetrator.

Citing sources in the defense contracting and intelligence consulting community, the iDefense report unambiguously declares that the Chinese government was, in fact, behind the effort. The report also says that the malicious code was deployed in PDF files that were crafted to exploit a vulnerability in Adobe's software.

“The source IPs and drop server of the attack correspond to a single foreign entity consisting either of agents of the Chinese state or proxies thereof,” the report says.

The researchers have determined that there are significant similarities between the recent attack and a seemingly related one that was carried out in July against a large number of US companies. Both attacks were apparently managed through the same command-and-control servers.

“The servers used in both attacks employ the HomeLinux DynamicDNS provider, and both are currently pointing to IP addresses owned by Linode, a US-based company that offers Virtual Private Server hosting. The IP addresses in question are within the same subnet, and they are six IP addresses apart from each other,” the report says. “Considering this proximity, it is possible that the two attacks are one and the same, and that the organizations targeted in the Silicon Valley attacks have been compromised since July.”

If the report's findings are correct, it suggests that the government of China has been engaged for months in a massive campaign of industrial espionage against US companies.

Update: Adobe disputes iDefense's claim that PDFs were used to deploy the malware. In a statement issued today, Adobe says that they have found no evidence that their technology was used as an attack vector in this recent incident. This is supported by independent research conducted by security firm McAfee, which has found evidence that a vulnerability in Internet Explorer—but not Acrobat Reader—was exploited in the attack.

This is like need for speed on roids

December 10th, 2009 admin No comments

A few weeks ago, Computer Choppers teased us with an image of the shell of it’s 24k Gold PS3.  At that time nothing was known except that it was a PS3 Slim dipped in 24k gold.  Today, Computer Choppers has released it’s 24k Gold PS3 to the world and been kind enough to supply us with some information.

The 24k gold PS3’s are now available and can be ordered like any of their other products.  Units start at $4,999, come with 2 24k gold controllers, and a 1 year warranty(just in case).  Customers who purchase one of these can get custom logos in chrome, black chrome, 24kt gold, white gold, rose gold, or platinum.

If customers would like to take things a step further and make theirs a little more unique, they will be allowed to create a PS3 logo with diamonds or almost any exotic material.  No word on how much extra that will cost you, but I’m sure it will.

There is a “jeweled” limited edition PS3 on the way for those seeking something more extravagant and limited.  Computer Choppers told us, “The limited edition model will be released in the coming weeks, unfortunately not in time for the Christmas holiday.”  By limited there will only be a few of these “jeweled” PS3s made.

We believe these will be the five 24kt Gold & Diamonds PS3 slims we were told about a few weeks back. We’ll let you know when those come around.  Those will probably be a bit more pricey, but for those who can’t afford those, the $5000 model is perfect for you!

More Photos:

Javascript For websites and blogs that allow Javascript tags
Object Tag For most websites and blogs
<embed src="http://cdn2.themis-media.com/media/global/movies/player/flowplayer.commercial-3.1.5.swf" flashvars="config=http://www.themis-media.com/videos/config/1211-80cd3b3d4b1b9729fa6a7ae93af31488.js%3Fembed%3D1" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="high" bgcolor="#000000" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" width="480" height="294" wmode="opaque"></embed>

Start-Up Promises More Game Realism

Engineers Say Technology Will Speed Production of Film-Like 3-D Images

A start-up founded by former Apple Inc. engineers said it has developed technology that could bring film-like realism to computer games and change the way movie makers and other design professionals work.

The San Francisco company, Caustic Graphics Inc., plans to exploit a technique called ray-tracing that generates extremely accurate three-dimensional images. Ray-tracing is a mainstay of Hollywood studios, but remains out of reach for most PC users. A single image can take hours to generate; rendering a film can take months on hundreds of server systems.

Computer games and other PC software typically rely on a technology called rasterization. Though the results keep getting more realistic, developing an interactive form of ray-tracing has been a longtime quest in the computer industry.

mk-au816_graphi_d_20090308182413

Caustic Graphics’ technology helps computer-generated images look more like photographs.

Caustic, whose name refers to light rays reflecting off a curved object, says it is close to achieving that goal. The company says its software and chips allow graphics chips to carry out ray-tracing calculations at a 20-fold speed-up compared with existing PC hardware. It said it expects to deliver chips by early 2010 that will be about 200 times faster.

In a demonstration, Caustic executives manipulated a photo-quality image of a sports car, removing components and changing lighting and background settings to change reflections on the vehicle’s surface.

“It’s the first honest acceleration of ray-tracing I’ve seen,” said Jon Peddie, a market researcher in Tiburon, Calif., who specializes in graphics technology.

Caustic faces many challenges. They include larger competitors and the need to persuade PC users to buy a second add-in card containing its chips, in addition to conventional graphics accelerators.

Caustic is largely the brainchild of James McCombe, a 26-year-old native of Northern Ireland who worked on graphics technology used in Apple’s iPhone and iPod. He left in 2006 with two other Apple engineers to form Caustic, a closely held company that employs 35 people and has raised \$11 million.

Mr. McCombe said graphics chips have hundreds of specialized calculating engines that are particularly good at rasterization, which converts three-dimensional models into pixels on a computer screen. Ray-tracing, by contrast, emulates the ways light rays bounce off objects in a scene. Graphics chips can’t easily handle those complex calculations, which require extensive communication between processors. Caustic has developed ways to keep data flowing to them efficiently, Mr. McCombe said.

Armed with the technology, Caustic executives say, designers who now work with the software equivalent of stick figures could manipulate realistic designs — without having to stop to render their images periodically. “This would really represent a breakthrough for us,” said Ron Frankel, president of Proof Inc., which develops “pre-visualizations” to show film directors and designers how movie scenes might be shot.

The company hopes to initially target architects, engineers and animators, and later entertainment applications on PCs and gaming consoles. Mr. McCombe expects accelerator cards using its chips to cost about the same as existing graphics accelerators, adding that its circuitry eventually could be combined with graphics chips. High-end graphics cards typically cost several hundred dollars.

But exploiting Caustic’s chips will require modifications to existing ray-tracing programs. Other companies, meanwhile, are finding ways to do ray-tracing using the microprocessors in PCs, rather than graphics chips. One is Bunkspeed Inc., which has a program called HyperShot that can make photo-quality images from three-dimensional computer models.

Philip Lunn, Bunkspeed’s chief executive, says that Caustic also faces potential competition from larger chip makers that include Intel Corp. and Nvidia Corp. The latter is collaborating with Mental Images GmbH, a software maker Nvidia acquired in 2007, to accelerate ray-tracing using graphics chips.

Mr. McCombe “is one of the smartest people in the business,” says Rolf Herken, Mental Images’ chief executive and chief technology officer. But “whether Caustic will have an impact on the design of future chips, that is an open question,” he added.

Write to Don Clark at don.clark@wsj.com

Adrianne Curry announced to Planet Twitter on December 6 that she planned to spend the afternoon playing World of Warcraft – naked and stoned. And, indeed, she did.

Adrianne Curry doesn’t mind sharing her peccadilloes with the world. A most recent case was December 6, when she tweeted her Sunday plans of getting high and playing video games in her birthday suit. The festivities followed her morning kickboxing workout.

“Jumping into shower,” the America’s Next Top Model winner wrote. “Going to spend my afternoon playing World of Warcraft butt naked and stoned. Perfect Sunday!”

To quell doubt, she snapped a picture and posted it on Twitter with the caption “Me… naked… playing World of Warcraft.”

Well, who’s to stop her? Aside from her own presence in the world as a modeling superpower, she’s married to none other than Christopher Knight, nee Peter Brady. And it was reportedly her husband’s joking around about Curry’s breast asymmetry – nicknaming her “One Hung Low” – that inspired plastic surgery to align her breasts.

“When you have a nice C-cup on one side and a very small boob on the other, it’s not cute,” Curry told Entertainment Tonight in 2006. “Especially when the other boob starts to sag because that’s the natural process of life.”

To fix the ordeal, she enlisted Beverly Hills surgeon Dr. Frank Ryan to reconstruct the area. He deliberately installed a mismatched pair of implants to even out the mounds.

“They’d go in with an implant, they’d sit me up while I was sleeping and look, and go, ‘It’s still not big enough to match the other,’ lay me back down, take it out, put a bigger one in, sit me up again and say, ‘Still not big enough,’ and kept going in and out to match me up,” she said.

Finally they got her straightened out. Curry indeed posted a nude photo of herself on Twitter this past week – but she is sitting in a way that obscures any real nudity. Try as you might, you can’t see much bareness. Even still, nothing above her waist seems to hang low.

Christmas is almost here and that means the NY Times has released a brand new list of the top 10 video games you shouldn’t buy for kids! Obviously you and I take this as a “run out and buy” list and, to give credit where credit is due, it is a pretty damn good list:

•Assassin’s Creed II
•Borderlands
•Brutal Legend
•Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2
•Dead Space: Extraction
•Dragon Age: Origins
•Grand Theft Auto IV: The Ballad of Gay Tony
•Demon’s Souls
•Left 4 Dead 2

A lot of this season’s most talked-about games include ones with excessive violence, negative role models, extreme gore, sociopathic behavior and other things that have been proven to have a negative effect on children.

Copenhagen climate summit in disarray after 'Danish text' leak

December 8th, 2009 admin No comments

Last
month, world leaders announced
that they no longer expect to reach a fully binding legal agreement in
Copenhagen, but Barack Obama's last-minute decision to attend the final day of
the conference signals that the U.S. president now thinks there will be
something significant to announce on that date. (And perhaps to take credit
for?) Until then, here are some developments to watch. How these debates play
out could determine what, if anything, will emerge from this month's gathering.

Sometimes the best is the enemy of the good - and sometimes
“good enough” is the enemy of all mankind.

That is why Jim Hansen, director of Nasa's Goddard Institute
for Space Studies and one of the world's leading climate
scientists, wants the global summit on climate change in
Copenhagen to fail.

“I would rather it not happen,” he told The Guardian in
London recently.

“The whole approach is so fundamentally wrong that it is
better to reassess the situation.”

In diplomacy, “good enough” solutions predominate because of
the need for compromise, but in this case, Hansen argues, it
is better to have no deal than the wrong deal.

He's right and most of the negotiators at Copenhagen know it.

Almost everybody involved knows what the one really fair and
effective deal would look like, although they feel doomed to
settle for something much worse.

In this case, the fair and effective deal would take full
account of the history, and it would look like this.

It would require the rich, industrialised countries to take
really deep cuts in their emissions: 40% by 2020, say, and
another 40% by 2035.

The developing countries would cap the growth in their
emissions at a level not much higher than where they are now,
but they must be allowed to go on growing their economies,
which means that they will need more energy.

All that extra energy has to be clean, or else they will
break through the cap.

They will therefore have to get their new energy from wind
farms or solar arrays or nuclear plants, all of which are
more expensive than the cheap coal-fired power plants they
rely on now.

Who pays the difference in the cost? The rich countries do.

What makes this lopsided deal fair is the history behind it.

Emissions in the developed countries have stabilised or
declined slightly (except for Canada, where they continue to
soar), but they are still at a very high level.

Indeed, what has made these countries rich is burning fossil
fuels for the past 150-200 years - and in doing so, they have
taken up almost all the available space.

In the early 19th century, the concentration of carbon
dioxide in the air was 280 parts per million (ppm).

It is now 390ppm, and four-fifths of that extra CO2 was put
there by the ancestors of the people who live in developed
countries.

The point of no return, after which we risk runaway warming,
is a rise in average global temperature of 2degC - the
equivalent to 450ppm of carbon dioxide.

All we have left to play with is the distance between 390ppm
and 450ppm, and on a business-as-usual basis we'll cover it
in less than 30 years.

All the economic growth of rapidly developing countries like
China, India and Brazil - 3-4 billion people - has to fit
into that narrow band of 60ppm that the developed countries
left for them.

That is why the post-Kyoto deal must be lopsided - but it is
still politically impossible to sell that deal to people in
the developed countries.

What we have on the table instead at Copenhagen is a bastard
version in which rich countries buy the right to go on
emitting lots of greenhouse gases by subsidising clean power
and other emissions reductions in the poor countries.

The Copenhagen summit will certainly fail to deliver the
right deal.

The danger is that it will lock us into the wrong deal, and
leave no political space for countries to go back and try to
get it right later.

Public opinion is climbing a steep learning curve, and the
assymetrical deal that cannot be sold politically today might
be quite saleable in as little as a year or two.

So the best outcome at Copenhagen would be a ringing
declaration of principles, and an agreement to get back round
the table and do the hard negotiations over the next 12-18
months.

Since the US Congress has still not mandated any reduction in
American emissions and Canada will do its best to subvert the
proceedings, that is also a quite likely outcome.

Gwynne Dyers latest book, Climate Wars,
was published recently by Scribe.

 

Developing countries react furiously to leaked draft agreement that would hand more power to rich nations, sideline the UN's negotiating role and abandon the Kyoto protocol

COP15: A Haitian delegation during second-day session at the Bella center in Copenhagen

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents.

 

The UN Copenhagen climate talks are in disarray today after developing countries reacted furiously to leaked documents that show world leaders will next week be asked to sign an agreement that hands more power to rich countries and sidelines the UN's role in all future climate change negotiations.

 

The document is also being interpreted by developing countries as setting unequal limits on per capita carbon emissions for developed and developing countries in 2050; meaning that people in rich countries would be permitted to emit nearly twice as much under the proposals.

 

The so-called Danish text, a secret draft agreement worked on by a group of individuals known as “the circle of commitment” – but understood to include the UK, US and Denmark – has only been shown to a handful of countries since it was finalised this week.

 

The agreement, leaked to the Guardian, is a departure from the Kyoto protocol's principle that rich nations, which have emitted the bulk of the CO2, should take on firm and binding commitments to reduce greenhouse gases, while poorer nations were not compelled to act. The draft hands effective control of climate change finance to the World Bank; would abandon the Kyoto protocol – the only legally binding treaty that the world has on emissions reductions; and would make any money to help poor countries adapt to climate change dependent on them taking a range of actions.

 

The document was described last night by one senior diplomat as “a very dangerous document for developing countries. It is a fundamental reworking of the UN balance of obligations. It is to be superimposed without discussion on the talks”.

 

A confidential analysis of the text by developing countries also seen by the Guardian shows deep unease over details of the text. In particular, it is understood to:

 

• Force developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts and measures that were not part of the original UN agreement;

• Divide poor countries further by creating a new category of developing countries called “the most vulnerable”;

• Weaken the UN's role in handling climate finance;

• Not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050, while allowing rich countries to emit 2.67 tonnes.

 

Developing countries that have seen the text are understood to be furious that it is being promoted by rich countries without their knowledge and without discussion in the negotiations.

 

“It is being done in secret. Clearly the intention is to get Obama and the leaders of other rich countries to muscle it through when they arrive next week. It effectively is the end of the UN process,” said one diplomat, who asked to remain nameless.

 

Antonio Hill, climate policy adviser for Oxfam International, said: “This is only a draft but it highlights the risk that when the big countries come together, the small ones get hurting. On every count the emission cuts need to be scaled up. It allows too many loopholes and does not suggest anything like the 40% cuts that science is saying is needed.”

 

Hill continued: “It proposes a green fund to be run by a board but the big risk is that it will run by the World Bank and the Global Environment Facility [a partnership of 10 agencies including the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme] and not the UN. That would be a step backwards, and it tries to put constraints on developing countries when none were negotiated in earlier UN climate talks.”

 

The text was intended by Denmark and rich countries to be a working framework, which would be adapted by countries over the next week. It is particularly inflammatory because it sidelines the UN negotiating process and suggests that rich countries are desperate for world leaders to have a text to work from when they arrive next week.

 

Few numbers or figures are included in the text because these would be filled in later by world leaders. However, it seeks to hold temperature rises to 2C and mentions the sum of $10bn a year to help poor countries adapt to climate change from 2012-15.